Insights into the Upcoming Serbian Elections

by George Alatsidis, Junior Political Analyst (M.A. Comparative Politics, University of Bucharest)

Image: Shutterstock

As the lights turn to Serbia’s political center stage, the 17^th December elections are set to mark another chapter in the country’s history, especially as a result of a tumultuous year in terms of political fervour and societal engagement. The following essay provides an insight into the upcoming Serbian elections, and the political and societal environment in 2023, especially after the two mass shootings which shook the entire country, which seem to have provoked the Balkan nation in its search for reforms and justice. Pointing to the 14^th iteration of multiparty elections since 1990, this essay analyzes the cyclical tendency and driving factors of Serbian early or snap elections, providing a specific focus on the phenomenon of stabilitocracy. Mass protests, stronger opposition, and new political alliances seem to represent a bigger challenge to the current leadership, but can they set the stage for changes in the political spectrum?

Având în vedere faptul că atenția se îndreaptă către centrul arenei politice a Serbiei, alegerile anticipate de pe data de 17 decembrie vor marca un nou capitol în istoria țării, în special în urma unui an zbuciumat, din punct de vedere al frământărilor politice, cât și al implicării societale. Acest eseu oferă o perspectivă clară asupra viitoarelor alegeri sârbe și a mediului politic și societal din 2023, mai ales după cele două atacuri armate în masă care au zguduit întreaga țară și care par să fi provocat națiunea în căutarea reformelor și a justiției. Indicând cea de-a 14-a iterație a alegerilor multipartide din 1990, acest eseu analizează tendința ciclică și factorii determinanți ai alegerilor anticipate sau anticipate din Serbia, oferind un accent specific asupra fenomenului stabilocrației. Proteste în masă, opoziție mai puternică și noi alianțe politice par să reprezinte o provocare mai mare conducerii actuale, dar pot toate acestea să pregătească terenul pentru schimbări în spectrul politic?

As the upcoming general elections in Serbia takes center in the political stage, approximately 6.5 million voters are poised to make their voices heard on the 17^th of December, marking yet another chapter in the nation’s electoral history. These early elections, a recurrent theme in contemporary Serbia, come at a time of heightened political fervor and societal engagement. Beyond the sheer act of casting votes, the forthcoming elections (local and parliamentary ones) bear the weight of a nation navigating its political crossroads, where unity, dissent, and the concept of stabilitocracy intertwine.

The forthcoming parliamentary elections mark the 14th iteration since the introduction of multiparty elections in 1990. Remarkably, out of these fourteen elections, only four parliaments have served a full mandate, whilst in the last decade alone, Serbia experienced a remarkable frequency of snap parliamentary elections. The years 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2022 witnessed the Serbians heading to the polls, each time in the form of early or snap elections. The upcoming 2023 elections (the third within almost four years) continue this trend, adding another layer to the complex tapestry of Serbia’s democratic journey. This recurrent pattern prompts reflection on the driving forces behind these frequent electoral exercises, extending beyond the conventional narrative of democratic necessity.

The current political landscape

The mass shootings of May 2023 that left 19 people dead (mainly children and young people), initiated a series of massive protests all over Serbia and served as catalysts for increased political activism, with citizens taking to the streets to voice their concerns. While the protests have continued, a core of opposition to the general policies conducted by the government and President Vučić seemed to have formed.

Indeed, an alliance was born out of the “Serbia Against Violence” protests, making it the largest opposition coalition in terms of the number of parties since 2012. The signatories of this groundbreaking agreement, mainly pro-EU political formations, include five parliamentary parties: the Democratic Party (DS), Green-Left Front (ZLF), Together (Zajedno), the People’s Movement of Serbia (NPS), and the Party of Freedom and Justice (SSP). Beyond these, the Free Citizens’ Movement (PSG), Ecological Uprising (EU), and the extra-parliamentary Serbia Centre (SRCE) party have also joined the coalition.

Serbia Against Violence representatives on 3 November 2023. Credit: СРБИН.инфо

The protests that led to the formation of this alliance became a turning point, not only in expressing public dissatisfaction, but in reshaping the political landscape. The ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), which had long held a dominant position, has meanwhile experienced a dent in its popularity. This decline follows months of opposition protests, and simultaneously an effort by the latter to unite their demands.

In this environment, the call for early elections by President Vučić has been perceived as a step in cementing his authority, as well as to stop the opposition from becoming a united front that could challenge the status quo of his regime. Moreover, the call came under a period of external pressure upon the ongoing talks between Serbia and Kosovo, requiring them to settle on a modus vivendi and modus operandi with each other.

Amid such political and social polarization, the decision taken by Vučić downplays another concept; that of stabilitocracy.

Stabilitocracy: Stability in political seas?

Governments often portray themselves as guardians of stability, standing as bulwarks against perceived internal and external threats. This narrative, while aiming to fortify the image of the political leader and the government around him, sometimes raises questions about the legitimacy of the threats posed. In Serbia’s political narrative, the notion of external threats and the government’s role in securing stability have been pronounced themes. However, scrutinizing these assertions is crucial, as it prompts a reflection on whether the perceived threats are genuine concerns or strategic tools to consolidate power.

Stabilitocracy, when unchecked, can potentially lead to non-democratic rule and democratic backsliding. The narrative of ensuring stability can inadvertently become a means through which a regime prolongs its position, justifying measures that might erode democratic principles.

In the specific case of Serbia, one of the notable aspects is the apparent stagnation in the domain of rule of law (judicial reforms, basic rights and freedoms, as well as independence of the media) in the process of EU accession. The prolonged stay in the accession process has led to concerns among experts who accuse the current Serbian government of undermining democratic institutions. This juxtaposition raises critical questions about the interplay between stabilitocracy, EU aspirations, and the democratic fabric of the current regime. The link between stability narratives and EU accession becomes a crucial factor in understanding the trajectory of Serbia’s governance.

Conclusions

The 14^th multiparty elections that take place in five days in Serbia will find the Balkan country at a juncture defined by dynamic political currents. The recurrent rhythm of early elections, the emergence of a formidable opposition alliance, and the influence of stabilitocracy paint a canvas where the hues of democracy, accountability, and stability blend in intricate patterns.

The simultaneous occurrence of local elections in key cities amplifies the significance of 17th December, as citizens not only determine the trajectory of national governance but also shape the leadership in their local municipalities. The unity forged in the aftermath of mass protests and tragic events underscores the resilience of Serbia’s democratic spirit, challenging political narratives and fostering a collective commitment to a more accountable and transparent future.

As the polling day approaches, the eyes of the nation and the international community will be keenly focused on Serbia, witnessing a democracy in motion, responding to the ebb and flow of societal expectations. Regardless of the results, the very act of democratic participation reaffirms the enduring strength of democracy, a force resilient in the face of change, challenge, and in the pursuit of a better future in Serbia and in the Western Balkans in general.

1. Image licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

In den letzten Jahren hat sich die europäische Migrationspolitik zu einem hochumstrittenen Thema entwickelt, das nicht nur die Mitgliedsstaaten der Europäischen Union (EU), sondern auch Drittstaaten in den politischen und moralischen Fokus rückt. Die italienische Regierung unter Ministerpräsidentin Giorgia Meloni verfolgt dabei einen besonders provokanten Ansatz: Asylverfahren sollen erstmals außerhalb der EU abgewickelt werden – in Lagern in Albanien.

Insights into the Upcoming Serbian Elections

Further reading: